ABSTRACT Introduction: We aimed to compare patient pain perceptions and bladder cancer detection rates following cystoscopy performed by physician associates/physician assistants (PAs) versus staff urologists (SUs). Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of our earlier single-center, prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial that originally investigated irrigation “bag squeeze” versus standard cystoscopy. In this analysis, 98 men who underwent flexible cystoscopy by either a SU or a PA were included. Patients completed a pain questionnaire following the procedure. Results: The mean pain score for SU-performed cystoscopy was 2.67 compared with 2.62 for PA-performed cystoscopy ( p = .92). A total of 23 cystoscopies (SU-performed, 11 23%; PA-performed, 12 24%; p > .05) resulted in positive or suspicious findings. Pathologic sampling was performed for 15 (SU-performed, 6; PA-performed, 9), out of which 8 total (SU-performed, 3 6.25%; PA-performed 5 10%) were positive for urothelial cancer. Conclusions: PA-performed cystoscopies demonstrate similar outcomes to those performed by physicians in terms of patient-reported pain scores and malignancy detection rates.
Misurka et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: