Background: We aimed to determine whether increased vertical displacement on upright clavicle radiographs (UCR) compared with supine clavicle radiographs (SCR) influenced the decision to operate.Methods: Adult patients with clavicle fractures identified on initial SCR or computed tomography scans during primary evaluation at a level 1 trauma center from July 2021 to November 2023 were included. The patients also underwent UCR. Exclusion criteria were patients with chronic or pathologic fractures, inadequate imaging, or incomplete documentation. Increases in vertical displacement from SCR to UCR were measured, and we recorded how often these increases on UCR prompted surgical management.Results: Overall, 160 patients (average age 47.0 years; 70% male) met the inclusion criteria. Most of the study population was managed nonoperatively (90%), with only 16 patients (10%) managed surgically. Only two of the 160 patients (1.3%) underwent surgical intervention based primarily on increased vertical displacement on UCR. With an average change of 4.5 mm (95% CI, 3.5–6.6 mm) between SCR and UCR for patients managed nonoperatively, and 5.1 mm (95% CI, 2.7–7.5 mm) for those managed operatively. There was no significant difference in management based on UCR (P=0.71). Subgroup analysis, stratifying patients by either ≥1 cm or <1 cm of displacement, found there was still no statistically significant change in SCR and UCR (P=0.44).Conclusions: Inpatient UCR rarely alters the management of clavicle fractures at our institution, indicating that its use is best reserved for case-by-case consideration.Level of evidence: IV.
Ungar et al. (Fri,) studied this question.