This paper reinterprets ancient sacred architecture through a sustainability-oriented analytical lens by applying a “structural identity” framework that integrates architectural form, socio-cultural function, and climatic adaptation. Through a diachronic comparison of the megalithic enclosures of Göbekli Tepe, Mesopotamian ziggurats, and Roman Mithraea, the study examines how sacred buildings operated not only as cosmological symbols but also as socio-ecological infrastructures that mediated resource use, environmental resilience, and community cohesion. The analysis identifies recurrent strategies such as elevation, thermal mass, enclosure, controlled thresholds, and water-related design that simultaneously addressed climatic constraints and articulated cosmological meaning. Comparative tables synthesise environmental, social, symbolic, and structural features of each case and relate them to contemporary sustainability principles and the UN Sustainable Development Goals. By situating temples as dynamic socio-ecological systems rather than static ritual monuments, the study demonstrates that ancient sacred architecture embodied adaptive strategies relevant to modern discussions of climate-responsive design, heritage preservation, and sustainable urban planning. The findings contribute to debates on the materiality of the sacred and highlight the value of structural identity as a transferable framework for interdisciplinary research on architecture, religion, and sustainability.
Salimi et al. (Thu,) studied this question.