Introduction The rapid advancement of technology has transformed teaching and learning in educational settings, introducing innovative tools into teacher education programs. Microlearning integration in the educational process is significantly influenced by the emergence of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools. This article investigates the impact of the integration of AI-based microlearning on the learning engagement of college students in a multimedia course within the educational technology department. Investigating engagement is essential as it influences students’ motivation, academic performance, and perceptions. Yet, research on AI-assisted microlearning remains limited, particularly in the Middle East, underscoring the need for further investigation. Methods Using an explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach, the study involved 50 students enrolled in an educational technology course. A quasi-experimental design was implemented and supplemented with a phenomenological approach. Data were collected from both experimental and control groups, along with online forum discussions and 25 semi-structured interviews with pre-service teachers who participated in AI-assisted microlearning. Results ANCOVA analysis revealed that AI-assisted microlearning positively influenced student engagement and its components. Through inductiveand deductive content analysis four main themes emerged, including cognitive, emotional, social, and behavioral engagement, further divided into six subthemes: grabbing attention, personalized learning, reduced frustration, task completion, sharing, and competition. Discussion The findings highlight the role of empowering educators through the integration of technology, equity, and innovation in higher education. AI-assisted microlearning serves as a pedagogical tool to foster inclusive, adaptive, and engaging learning environments. Recommendations include using AI to tailor content to individual learning styles, thereby supporting educators in delivering equitable and innovative educational experiences.
Salhab et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: