Chronic tinnitus presents a psychosomatic paradox: while the perceptual characteristics of the sound are often similar across individuals and typically linked to hearing loss, the distress it evokes differs substantially. This distress predicts the experiential quality, persistence, and chronification of tinnitus perception, thereby shaping what is recognised as chronic tinnitus or tinnitus disorder in clinical practice. In conceptualizing distress, two interconnected processes of medicalisation can be observed: first, the framing of distressing tinnitus as a medical disorder in its own right; and second, the framing of distress itself as a psychiatric "comorbidity." However, the dominant medical-descriptive frameworks in psychiatry that underpin these practices rely on atheoretical, categorical systems to classify emotional distress. These systems have well-documented limits in reliability, validity, and clinical utility and tend to privilege biomedical explanations over psychosocial context. At this juncture, the current paper examines three conceptual approaches to distress: (1) medical-nomothetic-descriptive, (2) psychological-nomothetic-descriptive, and (3) psychological-idiographic-descriptive - which becomes explanatory upon considering individuals' life contexts, meaning-based appraisals, and symptom functions. For both clinical and research practice in chronic tinnitus, we argue for a shift towards psychological-explanatory-idiographic models that account for person-specific interactions of vulnerability, stress , emotions, and coping (VSEC), linked through personal meaning. This aligns with a broader momentum towards idiographic, process-based therapies as the future of psychological intervention. Although meaning-centred formulations challenge nomothetic research methodologies, they offer clearer clinical reasoning and help avoid unhelpful medicalisation beyond somatic factors which contribute to initial symptom onset.
Boecking et al. (Tue,) studied this question.