Upper hemisternotomy vs. full sternotomy for hemiarch and proximal aortic replacement

Key Points

• Upper hemisternotomy demonstrates lower morbidity and mortality rates for aortic replacement, highlighting its safety.
• Findings show that using upper hemisternotomy can be a feasible option compared to full sternotomy in certain surgeries.
• This analysis highlights the effectiveness of upper hemisternotomy for hemiarch and proximal aortic replacement.
• Further larger studies are needed to validate the findings and enhance the understanding of this surgical technique.

Abstract