Adaptive learning systems increasingly rely on multimodal affective computing, yet many pipelines remain difficult to audit and pedagogically justify. We introduce NAILF (Neuro-Adaptive Artificial Intelligent Learning Flow) and formalise IPA 2. 0 as an interpretable continuous index integrating affective valence/intensity with attentional activation into a traceable intermediate signal for neuro-adaptive decision-making. Validation follows a two-level strategy. Study A performs a structured simulation over the full emotion–attention space (108 configurations), demonstrating numerical stability and coherent monotonic behaviour under controlled parameterisation. Study B evaluates external validity on the DIPSEER in-the-wild classroom dataset using subject-wise temporal calibration (lag/windowing/smoothing), hold-out evaluation, and explicit anti-leakage auditing. Across evaluable subjects (n = 172), Fisher-z aggregation shows a small but significant association between IPA 2. 0 and an external engagement criterion (rglobal = 0. 166, 95% CI 0. 017, 0. 308). A heterogeneous strong-signal subset (n = 25, rₑval ≥ 0. 50) supports personalised calibration as a core design principle. We discuss practical implications: IPA 2. 0 is not a sole predictor, but an auditable signal that can gate, rank, and explain adaptive interventions under real-world noise and label–signal asynchrony.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Arranz-Romero et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69abc1535af8044f7a4e9dde — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app16052515
Javier Arranz-Romero
University of Alicante
Rosabel Roig-Vila
University of Alicante
Miguel Cazorla
University of Alicante
Applied Sciences
University of Alicante
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: