Space weather monitoring depends critically on passive sensor systems that detect and measure natural solar and geospace emissions without transmitting radio frequency energy. These include riometers, solar radio monitors, interplanetary scintillation detectors, GNSS-based ionospheric sensors, and broadband solar spectrographs that enable the provision of critical data required to forecast geomagnetic storms, protect critical infrastructures, and support aviation services, satellite operations, and defense services. However, with the increasing proliferation of radiocommunication technologies such as 5G/6G networks, dense HF/VHF/UHF deployments, and large constellations of low-Earth-orbit (LEO) satellites, the interference threat to these exceptionally sensitive receivers has grown. Most of these operate near the thermal noise floor and thus require strict protection criteria to ensure continuity of data. This review and perspective article provides a cross-disciplinary synthesis of scientific requirements, documented RFI case studies, and ongoing regulatory developments related to spectrum protection for passive space weather sensors. It systematically integrates perspectives on physical, technical, and regulatory aspects that are typically addressed separately in the literature. The article reviews the operating principles of major sensor classes and analyzes documented RFI cases affecting GNSS, riometers, CALLISTO, BINGO, and systems impacted by LEO satellite emissions, drawing from existing reports and regulatory submissions. Building on this evidence base, the work comparatively evaluates regulatory methods under consideration for WRC-27 shows that hybrid approaches combining primary allocations in core observation bands with secondary status and coordination procedures in adjacent bands offer the most viable path forward. This synthesis contextualizes and analyzes how technical protection criteria can be integrated with existing and evolving regulatory instruments to inform spectrum governance. The study concludes that without coordinated international spectrum management incorporating explicit protection thresholds and registration procedures, the long-term viability of space weather monitoring infrastructure faces significant risk in an increasingly congested radio frequency environment.
Leite et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: