What question did this study set out to answer?

This research aims to evaluate the efficacy of two recanalization techniques for treating symptomatic non-acute long-segment internal carotid artery occlusion.

March 12, 2026American Journal of Neuroradiology0 citationsOpen Access

View Full Paper

Endovascular Treatment for Symptomatic Non-acute Long-segment Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion: Outcomes of Two Recanalization Techniques

CZChun ZhouNanjing Medical University ZJZhen-Yu JiaNanjing Medical University YCYuezhou CaoJiangsu Province Hospital

Key Points

This research aims to evaluate the efficacy of two recanalization techniques for treating symptomatic non-acute long-segment internal carotid artery occlusion.
Comparative analysis of ARSIS and AWDEP techniques
Assessment of stent burden in patients
Multi-center approach for broader data collection
ARSIS technique shows potential benefits over AWDEP
Arsis may reduce the number of stents needed
Further studies are recommended to verify findings

Abstract

Compared with AWDEP technique, ARSIS technique may be more beneficial for endovascular treatment of symptomatic non-acute LICAO, particularly could reduce the implanted stent burden. Prospective and multi-center studies are needed to further confirm the safety, efficacy, and durability of the ARSIS technique.

اسأل الذكاء الاصطناعي

Bookmark

View Full Paper

اسأل الذكاء الاصطناعي

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Endovascular Treatment for Symptomatic Non-acute Long-segment Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion: Outcomes of Two Recanalization Techniques

Key Points

Abstract

Cite This Study