Rapid and large-scale urban transformations destabilize historical continuity in both the material fabric of cities and the theoretical assumptions guiding urban design. This review reconceptualizes tabula rasa and palimpsest as a negative dialectic through which historical dis/continuity can be critically interpreted. Drawing on Henri Lefebvre’s account of the production of space and Marc Augé’s notion of non-place, tabula rasa is understood not as a neutral void but as a historically produced condition of erasure. Paul Ricoeur’s distinction between reconstruction memory and repetition memory informs an interpretation of the palimpsest as an active process of selective re-inscription, rather than a passive accumulation. Through engagement with Fredric Jameson’s cognitive mapping and Aldo van Eyck’s configurative discipline, the article advances methodological orientations for operating in contexts where historical anchors are attenuated or selectively preserved. Analyses of mapping and superposition techniques in the Parc de La Villette competition proposals by OMA/Rem Koolhaas and Peter Eisenman illustrate how dialectical strategies generate form under conditions of unstable continuity. The study argues that urban design necessitates neither presuming uninterrupted historical transmission nor treating erasure as neutral. By framing tabula rasa and palimpsest as mutually constitutive processes, the article clarifies how historical dis/continuity shapes contemporary urban form and proposes methodological instruments for engaging it critically.
Abusaada et al. (Thu,) studied this question.