This study presents a computational, simulation-based investigation of the dielectric response of human hand tissues, skin, fat, muscle, and bone to radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields emitted by mobile devices. The widespread adoption of handheld devices and the deployment of fifth-generation (5G) networks, including millimetre-wave (mmWave) bands, have intensified concerns regarding localized human exposure to RF radiation, particularly in the hand, which serves as the primary interface during device operation. Using validated dielectric property datasets, numerical simulations were performed across the frequency range of 0.5–40 GHz, employing the Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD) method to solve Maxwell’s equations, with analytical evaluations conducted in Maple-18. A heterogeneous multilayer hand phantom was developed, and simulations were conducted under controlled exposure conditions, including a transmitted power of 1 W, antenna gain of 2 dBi, and incident power density of 5 W/m2, consistent with ICNIRP and NCC safety guidelines. Tissue responses were assessed over a temperature range of 10–40 °C to account for thermal variability. The results demonstrate strong frequency- and temperature-dependent behaviour of dielectric properties, intrinsic impedance, reflection coefficient, attenuation, and specific absorption rate (SAR). At lower frequencies (<1 GHz), RF energy penetrated more deeply with distributed absorption and relatively low SAR values, whereas higher frequencies (3–40 GHz) produced highly localized absorption in superficial tissues, particularly skin and muscle. Increasing temperature led to significant increases in permittivity, conductivity, and SAR, with up to a twofold enhancement observed between 10 °C and 40 °C. These findings confirm that 5G and mmWave exposures result in predominantly surface-confined energy deposition in hand tissues. The study provides a robust computational framework for evaluating hand device electromagnetic interactions and offers quantitative insights relevant to antenna design, exposure compliance assessment, and the development of evidence-based safety guidelines.
Msughter et al. (Fri,) studied this question.