Machine learning-based heart sound analysis consistently achieved diagnostic accuracy above 80% for detecting coronary artery disease, outperforming conventional signal processing methods.
Systematic Review (n=13,814)
Does machine learning-based heart sound analysis improve diagnostic accuracy for coronary artery disease compared to conventional signal processing?
Machine learning applied to full-cycle heart sound signals demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy (>80%) for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease, outperforming conventional signal processing methods.
Abstract Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a major contributor to morbidity and mortality worldwide. Heart sound analysis has been investigated as a noninvasive approach to CAD detection, although existing evidence has been inconsistent. This systematic review evaluated the diagnostic performance of heart sound analysis for identifying CAD (≥50% stenosis). A search of four databases identified 1082 records, among which 40 studies involving 13,814 participants met the inclusion criteria. Among the 21 studies using signal processing methods, all but one of the larger studies (>50 participants, n = 15) reported diagnostic accuracy below 75%. The majority of signal processing studies lacked validation on independent datasets, thereby limiting confidence in the reliability of their reported performance. In contrast, 15 of the 19 studies applying machine learning-based methods reported accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity consistently above 80%. Moreover, 15 of these 19 studies conducted independent dataset validation, indicating comparatively stronger generalizability. Studies that used the full heart sound signal as model input also tended to achieve higher sensitivity than those using only the diastolic component, suggesting that utilizing the complete waveform preserves diagnostically informative features. These findings indicate that machine learning-based heart sound analysis may have diagnostic value for CAD, and larger multicenter studies are needed to further assess its clinical applicability and robustness.
Ainiwaer et al. (Mon,) conducted a systematic review in Coronary artery disease (n=13,814). Machine learning and signal processing of heart sound signals vs. Coronary angiography was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for identifying CAD. Machine learning-based heart sound analysis consistently achieved diagnostic accuracy above 80% for detecting coronary artery disease, outperforming conventional signal processing methods.