The claims resolution process is a cornerstone of the insurance industry, aiming to fairly and accurately determine the economic losses caused by adverse events. Traditionally, adjusters have relied heavily on expert judgment to perform this task. While this approach is essential, it often suffers from subjectivity, inconsistent criteria, and difficulty integrating complex data sources into objective analyses. In this context, Smart Industry tools—such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), Computer Vision (CV), and the Internet of Things (IoT)—have demonstrated high potential to automate damage detection and assessment; however, their effective integration into loss determination remains uneven across different productive sectors. This study addresses this problem through two objectives. First, we conducted a systematic literature review following PRISMA guidelines to identify which Smart Industry tools are currently used in the insurance sector for loss determination and to analyze their level of maturity in different productive sectors. We searched the Web of Science and Scopus databases, identifying 253 studies, of which 23 met our inclusion criteria. Second, based on the gaps we identified between the construction sector and more advanced industries such as automotive, we propose a methodological framework based on Building Information Modeling (BIM). Our results show that most solutions focus on the detection and technical classification of damage, especially in the automotive sector, while construction lacks methods to convert these technical findings into operational economic estimates. The proposed framework addresses this gap by standardizing technical and economic data from the underwriting stage, enabling more automated, traceable, and objective loss determination for infrastructure claims.
Acevedo-Bastías et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: