The knowledge argument is often presented as if Mary undergoes a single epistemic shortfall with a single metaphysical moral. This paper argues that the case is task-heterogeneous. What Mary allegedly lacks may concern discrimination, recognition, acquaintance, explanation, or some mixture of these, and those possibilities should not be run together. To regiment that heterogeneity, we introduce the phenomenal support profile, which represents a Mary-case as a map from phenomenal tasks to their minimal sufficient supports, and we enrich it with a transition-sensitive modal component that records whether a fixed representation remains sufficient across the epistemic and experiential transitions that structure the case. We then propose Meta-Mary, a disciplined relocation procedure that tests which parts of a support profile recur across representational interfaces and which remain as non-portable residue. The resulting claim is methodological rather than directly metaphysical. Failure of task-sufficiency supports, in the first instance, only representational inadequacy for the task in question. When the same support-demand or instability recurs under relocation, it is correspondingly less plausible that it reflects a level-specific ontological contrast. Only non-portable residue is even eligible to bear additional metaphysical weight, and even there an independent bridge principle is required. Mary does not reveal an ontological gap directly; it reveals that epistemic shortfall is task-relative, transition-sensitive, and often portable.
Lorand Bruhacs (Fri,) studied this question.