What question did this study set out to answer?

This study aims to identify factors that predict mucocutaneous exposure among health workers in Ghana's hospitals.

March 23, 2026One Health0 citationsOpen Access

What predicts mucocutaneous exposure among health workers? Insights from an analytical cross-sectional study of 10 major hospitals in the Greater Accra region, Ghana

PTPhilip Apraku TawiahKwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology EAEmmanuel Appiah-BrempongKwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology POPaul OkyereKwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology

Key Points

This study aims to identify factors that predict mucocutaneous exposure among health workers in Ghana's hospitals.
Conducted an analytical cross-sectional study in 10 hospitals in Greater Accra.
Recruited 602 participants through simple random sampling.
Analyzed data using Stata 15 and log-binomial regression to identify predictive factors.
61.8% of health workers reported mucocutaneous exposure in the past year.
Higher prevalence among nurses, midwives, and laboratory staff.
Irregular work shifts and understaffing linked to increased exposure.
Consistent use of personal protective equipment reduced exposures significantly.
Facilities with reporting systems had higher recorded exposures.

Abstract

Mucocutaneous exposure is a significant public health concern, especially in healthcare settings; while often preventable, these exposures occur frequently and carry a high risk of infectious disease transmission. In low- and middle-income countries, particularly, there is a significant knowledge gap about the relationship between irregular work schedules, at-risk healthcare workers, the effectiveness of splash exposure reporting systems, personal protective equipment (PPE) compliance, and mucocutaneous exposures. This study, therefore, examined factors associated with mucocutaneous exposure among health workers in Ghana. We conducted an analytic cross-sectional study in 10 hospitals in Greater Accra between January 30 and May 31, 2023. Six hundred and two (602) study participants were recruited through simple random sampling, and the data were analysed using Stata 15. Log-binomial regression analysis predicted factors linked to mucocutaneous exposure, with significance at p < 0.05. Overall, a greater proportion of health workers, 372 (61.8%) 95% CI: 57.8%–65.7%, reported experiencing mucocutaneous exposure in the past year. Mucocutaneous exposure was more prevalent among nurses, midwives, and laboratory staff. A mix of day, evening and night shifts adjusted prevalence ratio (APR) = 1.23 (1.08, 1.40), overtime work APR = 1.23 (1.08, 1.40), on-call duties APR = 1.24 (1.10, 1.39), understaffed APR = 1.15 (1.01, 1.32), established splash exposure reporting systems APR = 0.86 (0.76, 0.97), and the use of personal protective equipment sometimes APR = 0.76 (0.65, 0.90), most of the time APR = 0.75 (0.64, 0.87) and always APR = 0.80 (0.68, 0.93) were significantly linked to mucocutaneous exposure. These findings underscore the need for stronger institutional policies, consistent training, and thoughtful workforce planning to protect the health and well-being of frontline workers. • Mucocutaneous exposure prevalence among health workers was 61.8%. • Nurses, midwives, and lab staff were most exposed. • Irregular work shifts were linked to higher exposure. • Consistent Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) use significantly reduced exposure among staff. • Facilities with reporting systems showed higher recorded exposures.

اسأل الذكاء الاصطناعي

Bookmark

View Full Paper