What question did this study set out to answer?

To evaluate the effectiveness of novel forced choice trials in memory tests as indicators of noncredible performance.

March 26, 2026

Validation of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised forced choice trials as embedded performance validity measures

Key Points

To evaluate the effectiveness of novel forced choice trials in memory tests as indicators of noncredible performance.
Compared forced choice (FC) trials of HVLT-R and BVMT-R with RD indices
Analyzed sensitivity for identifying invalid performance
Conducted assessments on performance validity measures.
FC trials indicate potential for assessing noncredible performance
However, RD indices classified invalid performance more accurately
Further research is necessary for widespread FC implementation.

Abstract

Novel FC trials for the HVLT-R and BVMT-R may provide adjunctive indicators of noncredible performance. However, RD indices remain more sensitive overall. Though FC trials show promise, RD indices better classified invalid performance, and further research is needed before FC measures can be implemented widely.

Bookmark

Validation of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised forced choice trials as embedded performance validity measures

Key Points

Abstract

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider