What does this research mean for the field?

True oxymorons and absolute logical contradictions do not exist, as all apparent contradictions are merely artifacts of specific formal systems that can be resolved into coherence at a higher conceptual level. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.NOVEL_FINDING. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.CHALLENGES_CONSENSUS.

What question did this study set out to answer?

The aim is to redefine oxymorons by demonstrating their perceived contradictions through mathematical principles.

March 26, 2026Open Access

URB #487: The Oxymoron Dissolution

Key Points

The aim is to redefine oxymorons by demonstrating their perceived contradictions through mathematical principles.
Exploration of oxymoron definitions and examples.
Application of the Tralse Limit Theorem to contradictions.
Discussion of the Mathematical Subordination and Myrion Resolution concepts.
Confirmed that oxymorons exist as perceptions based on particular frameworks.
Demonstrated that every contradiction is not absolute but can exist within coherent systems.
Identified oxymorons as candidates for Myrion Resolution, requiring elevation to resolving levels.

Abstract

There are no true oxymorons. Every expression we call an oxymoron — "deafening silence," "living death," "cruel kindness," "jumbo shrimp," "necessary contingency" — is only *perceived* as self-contradictory from within a particular formal system or conceptual framework. By the Tralse Limit Theorem, τ(P) > 0 strictly for all P — nothing is perfectly, absolutely contradictory. By the Mathematical Subordination (URB #486), logical contradiction is a feature of specific formal systems, not of CCC-level reality. By Myrion Resolution, every apparent contradiction has a level at which both poles are simultaneously coherent without remainder. **An oxymoron is a Myrion Resolution candidate that has not yet been elevated to its resolving level.** Nothing more.

URB #487: The Oxymoron Dissolution

Key Points

Abstract

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider