The eleventh century is a paradox and watershed in East Roman history. One essential element is new nomadic polities entering imperial space from the Central Eurasian steppe, the Oghuz Turkish groups following members of the Seljuq lineage in the east, and Pecheneg polities in the west. In their attempts to develop narratives that explain their historical role, Roman historians engaged in historical ethnology. The traces lead back through six centuries of contact with “Turks”. Against “archaising” characterisations I argue that these writers took a critical approach to steppe ethnology, revealing a discourse stretching back for some half a millennium. Even so, Roman historians did not engage in historical ethnology for its own sake, but to utilise it in “policy debates”. In the twelfth century new conditions demanded new strategies of identification, leaving the eleventh-century ethnology a witness to a particular historical moment.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nicholas S. M. Matheou
University of Edinburgh
Journal of Late Antique Islamic and Byzantine Studies
University of Edinburgh
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nicholas S. M. Matheou (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69c7724e8bbfbc51511e2a0e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/jlaibs.2026.0055
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: