This study evaluates how the co-pyrolysis of two agricultural residues, corn stalk and rice husk, influences the physicochemical characteristics of the resulting biochar. Biochars were produced at 400 °C from each feedstock and from a 1:1 (w/w) mixture to assess interaction-driven behavior compared with the individual materials. The mixture biochar exhibited a broader particle-size distribution (SPAN = 3.36 ± 0.14) than the single-feedstock biochars, while maintaining a comparable BET surface area (13.17 ± 0.42 m2 g⁻1) relative to rice husk biochar (13.90 ± 0.35 m2 g⁻1) and slightly higher than corn stalk biochar (11.96 ± 0.28 m2 g⁻1). These results indicate that surface development was largely preserved despite particle coarsening, suggesting interaction effects between feedstocks rather than a purely additive mixing behavior. Zeta potential measurements showed negative surface charge for all samples (− 25.7 ± 1.3 to − 33.7 ± 1.2 mV), reflecting electrostatic surface characteristics associated with oxygen-containing functional groups and mineral phases, without being interpreted as direct evidence of adsorption performance. Mineral composition analysis revealed that the blended biochar integrated silica-rich and nutrient-associated inorganic phases, with Si, K, and Ca as major constituents. Spectroscopic and diffraction analyses further indicated a predominantly amorphous carbon matrix with retained mineral phases, while microscopy confirmed heterogeneous morphology consistent with the combined contribution of both biomass sources. Overall, co-pyrolysis at 400 °C produced a biochar with integrated structural and chemical characteristics derived from both residues. These physicochemical properties suggest potential relevance for environmental applications such as soil amendment or contaminant management; however, application-based experiments (e.g., soil incubation, sorption, or column tests) are required to verify nutrient retention and adsorption performance under realistic conditions.
Demir et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: