What question did this study set out to answer?

This study aims to compare the safety outcomes of oral food challenges before and after the implementation of oral immunotherapy at a medical center.

March 31, 2026Open Access

The shift towards lower-risk oral food challenges since the implementation of oral immunotherapy: a retrospective cohort study

Key Points

This study aims to compare the safety outcomes of oral food challenges before and after the implementation of oral immunotherapy at a medical center.
Conducted a retrospective chart review of oral food challenges (OFCs) at BC Children's Hospital from 2019 to 2021.
Compared outcomes of OFCs in the post-OIT era (n = 590) with pre-OIT data from 2014 to 2017 (n = 353).
Analyzed rates of positive OFCs and the necessity for epinephrine administration.
Patients experiencing positive OFCs decreased from 32.6% in the pre-OIT group to 26.3% in the post-OIT group (OR = 0.738, p = 0.0444).
The need for epinephrine in post-maintenance OIT OFCs dropped from 15.0% to 8.31% (OR = 0.542, p = 0.0164).
Among positive OFCs, severe reactions (Grade 4) were rare, observed in only 6.10% of cases.

Abstract

Abstract We previously published data on the safety of oral food challenges (OFCs) at BC Children’s Hospital (BCCH), which demonstrated high rates of anaphylaxis requiring epinephrine (15.6%). However, since the 2019 paper, the introduction of oral immunotherapy (OIT) for treatment of food allergies has been widely adopted at our center, resulting in significant practice changes in terms of when and for which patients to offer an OFC. As a result, we sought to compare outcomes of OFCs between the pre-OIT (2014–2017) and post-OIT (2019–2021) eras. We conducted a retrospective chart review of all OFCs completed 2019–2021 at BCCH (post-OIT, n = 590) and compared this to previously published data from OFCs between 2014–2017 (pre-OIT, n = 353). Relative to the pre-OIT cohort, we found patients undergoing OFCs to have significantly lower odds of positive OFCs (26.3% vs 32.6%, OR = 0.738, p = 0.0444). Further, OFCs completed after a period of maintenance OIT were found to have reduced odds of requiring epinephrine (8.31% vs 15.0%, OR = 0.542, p = 0.0164). We also observed a low severity in those with positive OFCs, with only 3/49 (6.10%) Grade 4 (severe) reactions. While multifactorial in etiology, we found changes in clinical practice with the adoption of OIT to be associated with a significant improvement in safety of OFCs preformed at our institution.

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sage et al. (Sun,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cb64f0e6a8c024954b8fb0 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-026-01028-y

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

Bookmark

View Full Paper