Hydrophobic Surface Modification of Microporous and Mesoporous Titanosilicates and Its Impact on Catalytic Performance in Epoxidation Reactions: A Review

Titanosilicates are Lewis acid catalysts widely applied in liquid-phase olefin epoxidation; however, in the presence of water, their performance is often limited by structural instability, active-site deactivation, and competing side reactions. This review critically examines hydrophobization strategies—based on controlled reduction in silanol groups or incorporation of organic functionalities—and discusses the experimental approaches used to evaluate surface hydrophobicity, including water adsorption measurements, infrared spectroscopy of silanols, contact angle analysis, and complementary spectroscopic methods. Although direct quantitative comparison among studies is hindered by differences in reaction systems and the lack of standardized catalytic metrics, consistent trends emerge. Lower silanol densities are generally associated with improved preservation of isolated tetrahedral Ti (IV) sites, higher H2O2 utilization efficiency, and reduced secondary epoxide ring-opening, leading to enhanced activity and selectivity under comparable conditions. These improvements are attributed to decreased local water activity, suppression of non-productive oxidant decomposition, and stabilization of Ti-peroxo intermediates responsible for direct epoxidation. Incorporation of organic groups produces a similar beneficial effect when introduced in moderate amounts, increasing surface hydrophobicity without significantly perturbing Ti coordination. However, beyond an optimal loading, catalytic performance declines due to pore blockage, diffusion limitations, and partial masking of active sites, revealing a threshold behavior. Fluoride also plays a dual role: when used during synthesis, it influences the insertion and distribution of framework Ti, whereas as a post-treatment, it primarily regulates silanol density and surface polarity while preserving active sites. Finally, hydrophobicity cannot be considered independently, as its impact depends on the solvent, oxidant, olefin nature, and active-site location, which collectively govern activity, selectivity, and catalyst stability.