A comparative analysis of pig-to-rhesus corneal xenotransplantation with various immunosuppressive regimens

Key Points

• This analysis aims to compare different immunosuppressive regimens in pig-to-rhesus corneal xenotransplantation.
• Clinical outcomes assessed using different immunosuppressive regimens: aCD20, aCD154, and aCD40.
• Comparative analysis of xenotransplantation outcomes in wild-type models.
• aCD20-based regimen shows comparable outcomes to aCD154-based regimen.
• aCD40-based regimen does not yield similar favorable outcomes.