February 25, 2005Open Access

Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Haemodynamic and metabolic parameters can be reversed more effectively by VAD than by standard treatment with IABP. However, more complications were encountered by the highly invasive procedure and by the extracorporeal support.

Read Full Paperexternally

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Thiele et al. (Fri,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d59fa0d93a727eca1f2c93 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehi161

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction2003 · 634 citations
2Use of vasopressor agents in critically ill patients2002 · 91 citations
3STUDIES OF CONTROLLED REPERFUSION AFTER ISCHEMIA1986 · 76 citations
4Clinical and research implications of new concepts in the assessment of cardiac pumping performance in heart failure1987 · 59 citations
5Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Is a Frequent Complication of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome1996 · 198 citations

Bookmark

View Full Paper