Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background: The German Biobank Node (GBN) is the central hub for German biobank activities and coordinates the German Biobank Alliance (GBA) to which 11 biobank sites in Germany belong. GBN, in cooperation with designated members of GBA, has developed various services and products for the German biobank community. To ensure that services and products are well aligned with the needs and interests of relevant stakeholders, GBN actively engages with its diverse stakeholder groups through different methods. Important stakeholder groups are the members of GBA who are generally the first users of developed products and services. Methods and Materials: Members of GBA were surveyed anonymously through a web-based application. The survey was sent to all members registered with an internal communication platform. Participants were primarily asked about their experiences with GBN, developed products and services, their wishes for the future of GBN/GBA, and their attitudes toward intensified cooperation on the European level. Answers were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis. Results: Overall 63 of 110 registered GBA members (response rate of 57%) finished the survey. Participants were overall satisfied with the work of GBN and developed products and services. They also pointed out room for improvement. Participants, for example, proposed to shorten the survey developed for biobanks to engage with their users. They also shared what additional support wishes they had, for example, uniform cost models or use and access policies for the GBA community. Discussion: The survey was helpful to get a good overview of the experiences and attitudes of GBA members before making services and products available to other actors in the German biobank community. GBN will use the feedback to improve its work and to guide future strategy development. Survey research has shown an adequate method to engage with this particular stakeholder group, but further research on choosing methods for stakeholder engagement might be helpful.
Klingler et al. (Fri,) studied this question.