Construction projects worldwide face escalating risks ranging from cost overruns and schedule delays to safety hazards and environmental impacts. These risks are amplified by increasing project complexity, stakeholder fragmentation, and the multidisciplinary nature of modern civil engineering endeavors. Despite considerable advances in both risk management and quality management disciplines, practitioners and researchers continue to treat these domains as functionally separate silos, resulting in missed synergies and suboptimal project outcomes. Objective: This article presents an integrated framework that systematically links risk analysis and quality management in civil engineering, grounded in the principles and processes of ISO 31000:2018 (Risk Management—Guidelines) and ISO 9001:2015 (Quality Management Systems—Requirements). Methods: The study employs a structured literature review, framework synthesis, and risk–quality matrix development, drawing on international standards, peer-reviewed empirical research, and established construction management methodologies published between 2015 and 2026. Results: The integrated framework demonstrates that proactive risk identification—through tools such as Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), probability–impact matrices, and Building Information Modeling (BIM)-based assessment—when embedded within a robust quality management system, significantly reduces rework rates, enhances safety outcomes, and improves schedule adherence. A 15-scenario risk–quality matrix operationalizes the framework for practical application. Conclusion: The convergence of risk-based thinking and quality management represents a paradigm shift in construction project delivery, offering practitioners an actionable roadmap for continuous improvement and project excellence.
VANDIR FILHO BECKER (Wed,) studied this question.