Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In this essay, I begin with the premise that everyday organizing is inextricably bound up with materiality and contend that this relationship is inadequately reflected in organizational studies that tend to ignore it, take it for granted, or treat it as a special case. The result is an understanding of organizing and its conditions and consequences that is necessarily limited. I then argue for an alternative approach, one that posits the constitutive entanglement of the social and the material in everyday life. I draw on some empirical examples to help ground and illustrate this approach in practice and conclude by suggesting that a reconfiguration of our conventional assumptions and considerations of materiality will help us more effectively recognize and understand the multiple, emergent, and shifting sociomaterial assemblages entailed in contemporary organizing.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wanda J. Orlikowski
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Organization Studies
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wanda J. Orlikowski (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8cb2da5ecc596b5d187fc — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607081138
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: