Both systems were safe and effective in microcoaxial phacoemulsification. The 1.8 mm system performed better with cortical-type cataract and the 2.2 mm system, with high-density nuclear-type cataract.

Bookmark

Cite This Study

Lee et al. (Fri,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d91bfbda3af5b1d08359c6 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.12.031

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Outcomes of coaxial microincision cataract surgery versus conventional coaxial cataract surgery2008 · 64 citations
2Risk factors for corneal endothelial injury during phacoemulsification1996 · 365 citations
3Continued Endothelial Cell Loss Ten Years after Lens Implantation1994 · 252 citations
4Phacoemulsification and Modern Cataract Surgery1999 · 252 citations
5Endophthalmitis and incision construction2006 · 43 citations

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Outcomes of coaxial microincision cataract surgery versus conventional coaxial cataract surgery2008 · 64 citations
2Risk factors for corneal endothelial injury during phacoemulsification1996 · 365 citations
3Continued Endothelial Cell Loss Ten Years after Lens Implantation1994 · 252 citations
4Phacoemulsification and Modern Cataract Surgery1999 · 252 citations
5Endophthalmitis and incision construction2006 · 43 citations