Pulse استكشاف nav.journalClub النقاشات الرائج الباحثون

Join discussions, follow papers, and never miss your next session.

Download on theApp Store

الرئيسية استكشاف nav.journalClub الرائج

⌘+K

Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women | Synapse

August 8, 2018Open Access

Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women

Key Points

To compare the effects of labor induction versus expectant management on perinatal outcomes and cesarean delivery rates in low-risk nulliparous women.
Randomized trial with low-risk nulliparous women at 39 weeks of gestation
Intervention compared labor induction to expectant management
ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01990612
No significant difference in composite adverse perinatal outcomes
Labor induction led to a significantly lower frequency of cesarean delivery

Abstract

Induction of labor at 39 weeks in low-risk nulliparous women did not result in a significantly lower frequency of a composite adverse perinatal outcome, but it did result in a significantly lower frequency of cesarean delivery. (Funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; ARRIVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01990612 .).

Read Full Paperexternally

اسأل الذكاء الاصطناعي

Like

Bookmark

Share

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Grobman et al. (Wed,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d955ce26e251a01968448e https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1800566

اسأل الذكاء الاصطناعي

Like

Bookmark

Share

View Full Paper