Artificial Intelligence in Thoracic Surgery: A Review Bridging Innovation and Clinical Practice for the Next Generation of Surgical Care

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming thoracic surgery by enhancing diagnostic accuracy, surgical precision, intraoperative guidance, and postoperative management. AI-driven technologies, including machine learning (ML), deep learning, computer vision, and robotic-assisted surgery, have the potential to optimize clinical workflows and improve patient outcomes. However, challenges such as data integration, ethical concerns, and regulatory barriers must be addressed to ensure AI's safe and effective implementation. This review aims to analyze the current applications, benefits, limitations, and future directions of AI in thoracic surgery. Methods: This review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for studies published up to January 2025. Relevant articles were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, focusing on AI applications in thoracic surgery, including diagnostics, robotic-assisted surgery, intraoperative guidance, and postoperative care. A risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and ROBINS-I for non-randomized studies. Results: Out of 279 identified studies, 36 met the inclusion criteria for qualitative synthesis, highlighting AI's growing role in diagnostic accuracy, surgical precision, intraoperative guidance, and postoperative care in thoracic surgery. AI-driven imaging analysis and radiomics have improved pulmonary nodule detection, lung cancer classification, and lymph node metastasis prediction, while robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has enhanced surgical accuracy, reduced operative times, and improved recovery rates. Intraoperatively, AI-powered image-guided navigation, augmented reality (AR), and real-time decision-support systems have optimized surgical planning and safety. Postoperatively, AI-driven predictive models and wearable monitoring devices have enabled early complication detection and improved patient follow-up. However, challenges remain, including algorithmic biases, a lack of multicenter validation, high implementation costs, and ethical concerns regarding data security and clinical accountability. Despite these limitations, AI has shown significant potential to enhance surgical outcomes, requiring further research and standardized validation for widespread adoption. Conclusions: AI is poised to revolutionize thoracic surgery by enhancing decision-making, improving patient outcomes, and optimizing surgical workflows. However, widespread adoption requires addressing key limitations through multicenter validation studies, standardized AI frameworks, and ethical AI governance. Future research should focus on digital twin technology, federated learning, and explainable AI (XAI) to improve AI interpretability, reliability, and accessibility. With continued advancements and responsible integration, AI will play a pivotal role in shaping the next generation of precision thoracic surgery.