ABSTRACT In a previous article, we proposed functional‐outcome‐driven tailoring (FODT) as a fresh and structured approach to managing the lifecycle of complex engineered systems. Recognizing that FODT introduces a shift from traditional methodology‐centric thinking to functional and outcome‐driven tailoring, this follow‐up addresses the natural next step: exploring whether the approach holds up in practice and how it can be implemented with confidence. This article investigates the validity of FODT by referencing real‐world analogs, policy alignment, and engineering trends across both traditional sectors (such as defense and aerospace) and broader industries (such as transportation, energy, civil infrastructure, and healthcare). While FODT formalizes a novel name, it is not untested—it draws on principles and practices already emerging in the defense and aerospace sectors. The goal is to support program and engineering leaders in confidently adopting FODT by grounding the approach in current evidence, operational precedents, and structured rollout guidance.
Barend Botha (Wed,) studied this question.