This article sets out the case for an international treaty to phase out the mining and burning of coal—a Coal Elimination Treaty, or CET—by 2030, as a way of addressing multiple weaknesses in the global climate change regime and as a medium-term success towards arresting average global heating at 1.5°C before 2050. Given the growing risk that the Paris agreement will fail to trigger rapid emissions reduction, we propose the CET as a global “supply-side” mechanism, and as a way of empowering climate-vulnerable and high-ambition states. We make an integrated environmental, public health and security case for a CET, specify its design principles, and propose three negotiation pathways, including a normative model inspired by the 2017 Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons; one that would progressively stigmatize, prohibit and eliminate coal so as to prevent a dire and unmanageable climatic future.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Burke et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69dbbec5387cf70698688951 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2020.100046
Anthony Burke
Canberra (United Kingdom)
Stefanie Fishel
University of the Sunshine Coast
Earth System Governance
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
UNSW Sydney
University of the Sunshine Coast
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: