Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Kidney transplantation (KT) is the optimal therapy for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), resulting in significant improvement in survival as well as quality of life when compared with maintenance dialysis. The burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in ESKD is reduced after KT; however, it still remains the leading cause of premature patient and allograft loss, as well as a source of significant morbidity and healthcare costs. All major phenotypes of CVD including coronary artery disease, heart failure, valvular heart disease, arrhythmias and pulmonary hypertension are represented in the KT recipient population. Pre-existing risk factors for CVD in the KT recipient are amplified by superimposed cardio-metabolic derangements after transplantation such as the metabolic effects of immunosuppressive regimens, obesity, posttransplant diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia and allograft dysfunction. This review summarizes the major risk factors for CVD in KT recipients and describes the individual phenotypes of overt CVD in this population. It highlights gaps in the existing literature to emphasize the need for future studies in those areas and optimize cardiovascular outcomes after KT. Finally, it outlines the need for a joint 'cardio-nephrology' clinical care model to ensure continuity, multidisciplinary collaboration and implementation of best clinical practices toward reducing CVD after KT.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Janani Rangaswami
Heart Failure & Transplant
Roy O. Mathew
VA Loma Linda Healthcare System
Raviprasenna Parasuraman
University of Michigan
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
University of Michigan
Cornell University
New York University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rangaswami et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69dbe0db387cf706986891e2 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfz053
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: