Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
ABSTRACT: The photographic, meterstick, and line-transect methods of measuring the percentage of land covered with crop residue were evaluated by comparing residue cover on 10 Iowa fields farmed with conservation tillage. Although the line-transect method overestimated crop residue by 6 to 10 percent, variability in measurements proved less than with the photograph and meterstick methods. The line-transect method is preferable for field use, particularly if technicians are carefully trained in its use and in self-calibration so that overestimation of crop residue can be avoided.
Laflen et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: