Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Engagement in goal setting resulted in the identification of functional goals that were perceived as motivating for children. Children described feeling valued and heard. Parents and clinicians recognized they had previously underestimated the capacity of children to identify their own goals. Parents wanted input from therapists, particularly related to shaping their goals to focus on shorter-term outcomes. Relational autonomy, which emphasizes the social and relational aspects of decision-making, may be more useful than traditional, individualistic views of autonomy for conceptualizing clinician roles in collaborative goal setting.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONChildren are often not optimally involved in setting their own rehabilitation goals.In this qualitative study, we report that children, parents, and clinicians recognized the value of optimizing child engagement in goal setting including children feeling heard, valued and more motivated to participate in therapy.Parents expressed a need for a collaborative approach to goal setting that respects child, parent, and clinician input.Relational autonomy may be a useful framework for reframing the role of clinicians in collaborative goal setting processes.
Pritchard et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: