The Energy Consumption of Radiology: Energy- and Cost-saving Opportunities for CT and MRI Operation

Background Awareness of energy efficiency has been rising in the industrial and residential sectors but only recently in the health care sector. Purpose To measure the energy consumption of modern CT and MRI scanners in a university hospital radiology department and to estimate energy- and cost-saving potential during clinical operation. Materials and Methods Three CT scanners, four MRI scanners, and cooling systems were equipped with kilowatt-hour energy measurement sensors (2-Hz sampling rate). Energy measurements, the scanners' log files, and the radiology information system from the entire year 2015 were analyzed and segmented into scan modes, as follows: net scan (actual imaging), active (room time), idle, and system-on and system-off states (no standby mode was available). Per-examination and peak energy consumption were calculated. Results The aggregated energy consumption imaging 40 276 patients amounted to 614 825 kWh, dedicated cooling systems to 492 624 kWh, representing 44. 5% of the combined consumption of 1 107 450 kWh (at a cost of U. S. 199 341). This is equivalent to the usage in a town of 852 people and constituted 4. 0% of the total yearly energy consumption at the authors' hospital. Mean consumption per CT examination over 1 year was 1. 2 kWh, with a mean energy cost (±standard deviation) of 0. 22 ± 0. 13. The total energy consumption of one CT scanner for 1 year was 26 226 kWh (4721 in energy cost). The net consumption per CT examination over 1 year was 3580 kWh, which is comparable to the usage of a two-person household in Switzerland; however, idle state consumption was fourfold that of net consumption (14 289 kWh). Mean MRI consumption over 1 year was 19. 9 kWh per examination, with a mean energy cost of 3. 57 ± 0. 96. The mean consumption for a year in the system-on state was 82 174 kWh per MRI examination and 134 037 kWh for total consumption, for an energy cost of 24 127. Conclusion CT and MRI energy consumption is substantial. Considerable energy- and cost-saving potential is present during nonproductive idle and system-off modes, and this realization could decrease total cost of ownership while increasing energy efficiency. © RSNA, 2020.