Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Sustainable products offered in today’s marketplace are labelled with product-related green attributes (i.e. green core attributes) or non-product-related green attributes (i.e. green peripheral attributes). The current research investigates consumers’ inferences about a product’s functional quality when its core attributes are green (e.g. the ingredients) and when its peripheral attributes are green (e.g. the product packaging). Four experimental studies and an internal meta-analysis show that there is a sustainability liability effect in strength-dependent categories (for both core and peripheral attributes), and a sustainability asset effect in gentleness-dependent categories (for core attributes only). Our research contributes to the current understanding of how consumers make inferences about product quality when contemplating different types of green attributes. The findings have implications for how strength-dependent and gentleness-dependent products should be labelled as green.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Siv Skard
Norwegian School of Economics
Sveinung Jørgensen
University of Inland Norway
Lars Jacob Tynes Pedersen
Aarhus University
Journal of Business Ethics
Norwegian School of Economics
University of Inland Norway
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Skard et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69df32efa18d9cfb537a0da1 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04415-1
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: