Defamation harms one’s reputation, exposing an individual to ridicule or contempt. Defamation laws aim to strike a delicate balance between the constitutional right to freedom of expression and the protection of individual reputation. In democratic states, this balance is indispensable to protect dignity, ensure accountability, facilitate the free flow of verified information, and promote open debate. Pakistan has established defamation laws at both the federal and provincial levels to maintain this essential balance. More recently, for the digital dimension, Pakistan enacted the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act 2016 to tackle, inter alia, defamatory content floating through electronic means. Despite Punjab having enacted the Punjab Defamation Act 2024 to combat fake news; nevertheless, this article is restricted to a critical analysis of the judicial interpretation of the Defamation Ordinance 2002, which was enacted with the objective to redress all matters related to defamation in Pakistan. The concept of defamation thrives in civil tort law and is a matter of the reputation of an individual, which has been loosely and broadly considered by Pakistani courts, thereby setting up unhindered bridges to fill gaps between the law of defamation and Pakistani courts' jurisprudence. After exploring all contents of the landmark cases on defamation, this paper endeavours to pinpoint the issues regarding defamation actionable, jurisdictional conflicts and quantification of damages and point out that more than two decades after Defamation Ordinance 2002, the judicial interpretation of Pakistani defamation law is in its embryonic stage and has not been fully matured into a consistent and balanced-complaint framework.
Farqaleet Khokhar (Mon,) studied this question.