Structural forcing results operate within an admissibility regime. It is commonly assumed that such regimes are given or chosen, and therefore cannot be validated against reality from within the method that uses them. This paper addresses a prior question: are the admissibility conditions of the persistence problem optional, or are they themselves structurally forced? This paper shows that C1-C3 are not modeling assumptions but are induced by the possibility of forming a persistence verdict at all. The admissibility regime of La Profilée (LP) is not externally given. It is the minimal structure under which the persistence problem exists. LP does not derive a law within a chosen regime. It identifies the unique structure under which the regime itself becomes definable.
Marc Maibom (Mon,) studied this question.