Type II eccentric lesions were significantly more frequent in angina-producing arteries of patients with unstable angina (70.7%) compared to those with stable angina (16.0%; p<0.0001).
Observational (n=110)
Does the angiographic morphology of coronary artery lesions differ between patients with stable and unstable angina?
Type II eccentric lesions are strongly associated with unstable angina, suggesting they may represent ruptured atherosclerotic plaques or partially occlusive thrombi.
Absolute Event Rate: 70.7% vs 16%
p-value: p=<0.0001
In 110 patients with either stable or unstable angina, the morphology of coronary artery lesions was qualitatively assessed at angiography. Each obstruction reducing the luminal diameter of the vessel by 50% or greater was categorized into one of the following morphologic groups: concentric (symmetric narrowing); type I eccentric (asymmetric narrowing with smooth borders and a broad neck); type II eccentric (asymmetric with a narrow neck or irregular borders, or both); and multiple irregular coronary narrowings in series. For the entire group, type II eccentric lesions were significantly more frequent in the 63 patients with unstable angina (p less than 0.001), whereas concentric and type I eccentric lesions were seen more frequently in the 47 patients with stable angina (p less than 0.05). Type II eccentric lesions were also present in 29 of 41 arteries in patients with unstable angina compared with 4 of 25 arteries in those with stable angina (p less than 0.0001) in whom an "angina-producing" artery could be identified. Therefore, type II eccentric lesions are frequent in patients with unstable angina and probably represent ruptured atherosclerotic plaques or partially occlusive thrombi, or both. A temporary decrease in coronary perfusion secondary to these plaques with or without superimposed transient platelet thrombi or altered vasomotor tone may be responsible for chest pain in some of these patients with unstable angina.
أجرى أمبروز وآخرون (جمعة) دراسة رصدية في حالة الذبحة الصدرية المستقرة أو غير المستقرة (n=110). تم تقييم الذبحة الصدرية غير المستقرة مقابل الذبحة الصدرية المستقرة بناءً على تكرار الآفات التركيبية النمط II في الشرايين المسببة للذبحة الصدرية (p=<0.0001). كانت الآفات التركيبية النمط II أكثر شيوعًا بشكل كبير في الشرايين المسببة للذبحة الصدرية للمرضى الذين يعانون من الذبحة الصدرية غير المستقرة (70.7%) مقارنةً بأولئك الذين يعانون من الذبحة الصدرية المستقرة (16.0%; p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: