Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Bronfenbrenner’s model of bio-ecological development has been utilised widely within the social sciences, in the field of human development, and in social work. Yet, while championing the rights of marginalised families and communities, Bronfenbrenner had under-theorised the role of power, agency and structure in shaping the ‘person–context’ interrelationship, life opportunities and social wellbeing. To respond to this deficit, this article first outlines Bronfenbrenner’s ‘person, process, context and time’ model. It then seeks to loosely align aspects of Bronfenbrenner’s model with Bourdieu’s analytical categories of habitus, field and capital. It is argued that these latter categories enable social workers to develop a critical ecology of child development, taking account of power and the interplay between agency and structure. The implications of the alignment for child and family social work are considered in the final section.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Stan Houston (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69ea039584ff3f95efccf6bc — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/204674315x14281321359847
Stan Houston
University of Alberta
Families Relationships and Societies
Queen's University Belfast
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...