The presence of calcium sulfate (CaSO 4 ) impacts soil structure, bonding, pore size distribution, and water‐holding characteristics, altering both compaction characteristics and soil water characteristic curves (SWCC). In this study, compacted sand with different amounts of gypsum (0–60%) were tested under controlled stresses, focusing on assessing the combined influence of gypsum (Gc) and net‐normal stress ( σ n ) on the SWCC characteristics under drying–wetting conditions. The results demonstrate that adding gypsum to sand makes the SWCC shape flatter, and the position is shifted upward to the left side. The SWCC‐suction parameters at air entry and residual point for drying and wetting curves ( ψ a , ψ r , ψ ae , and ψ we ) increase when gypsum content increases, whereas the corresponding SWCC‐water content parameters ( θ a , θ r , θ ae , and θ we ) generally decrease first and then increase beyond 20% gypsum content in drying and 40% in wetting. The SWCC‐suction parameters ( ψ a and ψ ae ) increase first and then decrease as net‐normal stress increases while the ( ψ r and ψ we ) express a decrease rate. The water content parameters ( θ a and θ ae ) show a reduction trend with increasing net‐normal stress, and the influence is insignificant on the parameters ( θ r and θ we ). The hysteresis area (HA) trend was affected by the combined effect of both Gc and σ n . Water holding capacity (WHC) generally increases with Gc; however, at certain Gc, it decreases with an increasing σ n . Fitting the classical SWCC models shows that it is possible to use these models for estimating SWCC of soils containing relatively low gypsum content (Gc ≤ 20%). For gypsum rich soils, both SSR and RMSE exhibit an increase trend indicating poor prediction because of the emerging dual‐porosity behavior that is not entirely captured by the models. In general, the SWCC behavior was dominated by sand skeleton, gypsum cementation, and pore‐filling mechanisms in low gypsum mixtures, whereas the evolved microstructural alteration governed the high gypsum mixtures.
Al-Moadhen et al. (Thu,) studied this question.