In this article, the decision of the New Zealand Supreme Court in Rasier Operations BV et al. v. E TU Incorporated et al. SC 105/2024 2025 NZSC 162 is examined. That case deals with the critical question of whether Uber drivers were employees or contractors of Uber. The Supreme Court found that the Uber drivers were employees within section 6 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 and still focused on the intention of the parties in determining this issue, backed up by the traditional tests of control, integration and business reality. This is Part Two of the article.
Chris Ohms (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: