In the United States, most urban areas are served by sewers and wastewater treatment plants, while septic systems remain common in rural regions, in lower-density communities, and in areas with lower levels of public services. The policy frameworks for septic system management are complex and variable, involving multiple key actors and levels of government and varying considerably from place to place. This research seeks to characterize the septic system management practices in two New York State watersheds: The first study area is located in central New York (the Lower Seneca River watershed) and comprises communities with greater reliance on surface water, and the second is in eastern New York on Long Island (Peconic Estuary Watershed), where groundwater is the primary source of drinking water. Since homeowner practices play a central role in outcomes, we also investigate homeowners’ understandings of their septic systems (also called onsite wastewater treatment systems, or OWTS). The methods used include policy analysis as well as qualitative research methods (interviews, focus groups, and survey research) to characterize homeowners’ perceptions and understandings, including their awareness of grant programs for septic system upgrades and replacement. The results show that most septic system owners hold only partial understandings of their systems. Their awareness of the connections between septic system management and groundwater protection is limited, with noted differences across watersheds. The study findings can inform future planning initiatives, as they illustrate the value of placing community water system understanding at the forefront of outreach efforts.
Moran et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: