Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Everyone is concerned about Internet security, yet most traffic isn't cryptographically protected. The typical justification is that most attackers are off path and can't intercept traffic; hence, intuitively, challenge-response defenses should suffice to ensure authenticity. Often, the challenges reuse existing header fields to protect widely deployed protocols such as TCP and DNS. This practice might give an illusion of security. Recent off-path TCP injection and DNS poisoning attacks enable attackers to circumvent existing challenge-response defenses. Both TCP and DNS attacks are nontrivial, yet practical. The attacks foil widely deployed security mechanisms and allow a wide range of exploits, such as long-term caching of malicious objects and scripts.
Gilad et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: