A consensus definition and improved surveillance tools are urgently needed for postoperative atrial fibrillation to better understand its epidemiology and address demographic disparities in outcomes.
Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) lacks a consensus definition but is generally considered to be atrial fibrillation (AF) that develops following surgery. There is disagreement as to whether POAF must be de novo or whether a patient with a history of AF episodes can have true POAF. POAF has been more studied after cardiac versus noncardiac surgery, but this may be the result of less postoperative cardiac monitoring after noncardiac surgery. POAF can be clinically silent, paroxysmal, and self-terminating, or it may persist and have the potential to evolve into more chronic forms of AF. The pathogenesis of POAF has yet to be fully elucidated. A recent study indicates that postoperative atrial flutter may occur more often than previously thought and may be underestimated as a postoperative risk. Cancer surgeries have high rates of POAF, particularly following surgeries for lung, colorectal, gastrointestinal, and hematologic cancers. Among the best-known POAF risk factors are older age, male sex, White race, duration of surgery, comorbidities, and history of cardiac disease. The Black paradox of POAF finds that Black patients have more risk factors and more severe risk factors than White patients for POAF, yet Black patients are less likely to develop POAF than White patients. However, a Black patient with POAF is more likely to have a worse outcome than a White patient. A female paradox has also come to light, because women often have more risk factors for POAF than men but develop POAF less often; however, when POAF occurs in females, they can have severe outcomes. Urgently needed is a consensus definition of POAF to support epidemiologic and clinical work, and more widely used monitoring and surveillance tools to detect POAF when it does occur.
Bilkovski et al. (Mon,) studied this question.