Increased visceral adiposity was independently associated with incident hypertension (RR 1.22; 95% CI 1.06-1.39 per 1-SD increase), whereas total and subcutaneous adiposity were not.
Cohort (n=903)
Incident hypertension (n=903)
Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) vs Subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and lower body fat (LBF) (per 1-SD increase)
Incident hypertension (SBP ≥140 mm Hg, DBP ≥90 mm Hg, or initiation of blood pressure medications) — RR 1.22 (1.06-1.39)
Effect estimate: RR 1.22 (95% CI 1.06-1.39)
BACKGROUND: Obesity has been linked to the development of hypertension, but whether total adiposity or site-specific fat accumulation underpins this relationship is unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the relationship between adipose tissue distribution and incident hypertension. METHODS: Normotensive participants enrolled in the Dallas Heart Study were followed for a median of 7 years for the development of hypertension (systolic blood pressure SBP ≥140 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg, or initiation of blood pressure medications). Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) was quantified by magnetic resonance imaging and proton-spectroscopic imaging, and lower body fat (LBF) was imaged by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Multivariable relative risk regression was performed to test the association between individual fat depots and incident hypertension, adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, diabetes, smoking, SBP, and body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: Among 903 participants (median age, 40 years; 57% women; 60% nonwhite; median BMI 27.5 kg/m(2)), 230 (25%) developed incident hypertension. In multivariable analyses, higher BMI was significantly associated with incident hypertension (relative risk: 1.24; 95% confidence interval: 1.12 to 1.36, per 1-SD increase). However, when VAT, SAT, and LBF were added to the model, only VAT remained independently associated with incident hypertension (relative risk: 1.22; 95% confidence interval: 1.06 to 1.39, per 1-SD increase). CONCLUSIONS: Increased visceral adiposity, but not total or subcutaneous adiposity, was robustly associated with incident hypertension. Additional studies will be needed to elucidate the mechanisms behind this association.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Alvin Chandra
Cardio-Oncology
Ian J. Neeland
Preventive Cardiology
Jarett D. Berry
Preventive Cardiology
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chandra et al. (Mon,) conducted a cohort in Incident hypertension (n=903). Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) vs. Subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and lower body fat (LBF) was evaluated on Incident hypertension (SBP ≥140 mm Hg, DBP ≥90 mm Hg, or initiation of blood pressure medications) (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.06-1.39). Increased visceral adiposity was independently associated with incident hypertension (RR 1.22; 95% CI 1.06-1.39 per 1-SD increase), whereas total and subcutaneous adiposity were not.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69f0271b4a030179bdc8d72d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.05.057
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: