Intergenerational justice presents complex challenges for constitutional governance. Existing policy and legal structures frequently prioritize the interests of current populations, leaving unborn generations without formal political representation, even though long-term decisions on climate change, fiscal sustainability, and social welfare directly shape their future conditions. This paper explores the concept of intergenerational constitutionalism, with particular emphasis on the possibility of granting proxy voting rights or legal standing to unborn generations. It evaluates theoretical foundations, comparative institutional approaches, practical limitations, and normative frameworks, ultimately proposing mechanisms for incorporating the interests of future citizens into contemporary democratic decision-making.
Jubaer Shah (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: