ObjectiveThis study aimed to develop multimodal prediction models based on real-world clinical data for classifying different stages of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and for predicting the conversion from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to AD.MethodsA single-center retrospective real-world cohort study was conducted. A total of 658 individuals aged ≥50 years were included and classified into cognitively normal (CN), MCI, and AD groups. Demographic characteristics, neurocognitive assessment results, conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features, and blood-based biomarkers were collected. Logistic regression was used to construct pairwise classification models for disease stages and prediction models for MCI-to-AD conversion. Model performance was evaluated through stepwise integration of multimodal features. Discrimination ability was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), together with calibration curves and decision curve analysis. In a sub-cohort with thin-slice MRI data, the additional value of hippocampal volume was further examined.ResultsSignificant differences were observed among disease stages in cognitive function, imaging markers, and blood biomarkers (all p < 0.05). Multimodal fusion models achieved the best performance in disease stage classification (CN vs. AD: AUC = 0.96 ± 0.01; MCI vs. AD: AUC = 0.86 ± 0.03). The conversion prediction model integrating multimodal features showed good discrimination (AUC = 0.87) and satisfactory calibration. In the thin-slice MRI sub-cohort, inclusion of hippocampal volume increased the AUC to 0.88.ConclusionMultimodal prediction models based on real-world clinical data improved the accuracy of AD stage classification and the prediction of MCI-to-AD conversion risk. These models demonstrated good clinical feasibility. High-resolution structural imaging markers further enhanced predictive performance in selected populations.
Wang et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: