This paper investigates the justice of God through a multidisciplinary lens, drawing on biblical exegesis, systematic theology, legal philosophy, and personal testimony. Beginning with the question of whether God acts justly, the paper surveys a range of scriptural evidence—the death of the Egyptian firstborn, the suffering of Job, the punishment of Moses, the destruction of Assyria—and argues that God's punishments are frequently disproportionate, indiscriminate, and in excess of any recognisable standard of justice. God is characterised as fundamentally wild: untamable, self-legitimating, and operating according to a circular logic in which He constitutes rather than conforms to justice. The paper then examines the counterevidence—instances of divine mercy, restoration, and care for the marginalised—before turning to the significance of the Incarnation. Jesus Christ is presented as God's response to His own wildness: an unprecedented act of self-giving in which divine wrath is absorbed and replaced by grace. The paper concludes that God, measured by human moral standards, acts unjustly; that this injustice is most acute in cases of extreme suffering beyond the reach of faith; and that the most honest answer available is to orient oneself entirely toward Jesus Christ—the fullest and most mature expression of what God is.
Vincent Liu (Fri,) studied this question.