Female reproductive system disorders such as dysmenorrheal, leucorrhoea, polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), infertility, and menopausal complaints are highly prevalent and significantly affect the quality of life of women. Homoeopathy emphasizes individualization through totality of symptoms, and repertory serves as a scientific tool for systematic case analysis. Classical repertories like Kent’s Repertory, Boericke’s Repertory, and Synthesis Repertory provide extensive rubrics related to obstetrical and gynecological disorders. An evidence-based evaluation of reportorial application in such conditions is essential for strengthening clinical outcomes. -Objectives: 1.To evaluate the effectiveness of repertorial approach in managing selected female reproductive system disorders.2.To compare rubric selection and remedy outcome across different homoeopathic repertories.3.To assess clinical improvement using defined outcome measures.-Methods: A Prospective Observational clinical study was conducted on Diagnosed cases of common Gynecological disorders including -Dysmenorrhoea, leucorrhoea, PCOS, and menopausal syndrome. Detailed case taking was performed according to homoeopathic principles. Cases were repertorized using classical repertories, and remedy selection was based on totality and material medica confirmation. Follow-ups were conducted at regular intervals over a defined study period. Clinical assessment was conducted using symptom scoring scales and objective diagnostic parameters, as applicable. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistical methods.-Results: The reportorial approach demonstrated significant symptomatic improvement in the majority of cases. Individualized remedies selected through systematic repertorisation showed reduction in frequency, intensity, and duration of symptoms. Comparative analysis revealed consistency in core constitutional remedies across repertories, though rubric depth and cross-referencing varied. Objective parameters (where applicable) also showed measurable improvement. No adverse effects were reported.
null et al. (Tue,) studied this question.